These project envelopes, electricity connections, portfolio disclosures and contracts add context. They use different boundaries and units, and overlap named sites. Read each separately; they are not an extra subtotal to add to the cards above.
Commercial commitmentAustraliaContracted
Western Downs developer confirms an Anthropic lease
The developer confirms Anthropic has signed a long-term lease at Western Downs Digital Park. The proposed campus remains subject to planning and regulatory approvals.
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · Zerra DC
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
- Workloads described
- Not specified in this evidence
How to read this: Current primary material does not quantify leased IT MW, identify building-one capacity or confirm a 2027 delivery date. Reported campus capacity and an unquantified lease are different claims.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaAnnouncement
Western Downs discloses apparent electrical power per stage
Western Downs Digital Park describes four development stages and approximately 540 MVA of total facility demand per stage. That is an electrical design specification, not measured consumption or disclosed IT capacity.
- Total facility demand design per stage
- ≈ 540 MVA
Undated developer FAQ reviewed 22 September 2026- Planned development stages
- ≤ 4 stages
Undated developer FAQ reviewed 22 September 2026
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · Zerra DC
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: Do not convert 540 MVA into IT MW, add it to a reported 360 MW figure, or combine the four-building application with a separate six-building engineering scenario.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaAnnouncement
Aurora has a staged pathway toward gigawatt-scale development
1414 Degrees disclosed a Heads of Agreement for up to 1 GW of data-centre infrastructure, beginning with an indicative 17 MW campus and an approximately 200 MW anchor campus as connection infrastructure progresses.
- Ultimate data-centre pathway, power basis unspecified
- ≤ 1,000 MW
Heads of Agreement announced 27 July 2026- Nested starter campus, power basis unspecified
- ≈ 17 MW
Heads of Agreement announced 27 July 2026- Nested anchor campus, power basis unspecified
- ≈ 200 MW
Heads of Agreement announced 27 July 2026
- Evidence scope
- Named facility
- Evidence as-of date
- 2026-07-27
How to read this: The figures are nested and cannot be added. No explicit IT basis, named operating partner, final customer contract or absolute completion date is disclosed. Energy assets are separate. The Heads of Agreement is non-binding except specified exclusivity/right-of-first-refusal provisions.
Inspect 4 sources
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationANZAnnouncement
CDC reports a 3.9 GW leasable ANZ pipeline
September 2026 investor update reports 3.9 GW leasable pipeline as at 30 June 2026. Earlier 1.7 GW leasable capacity corresponded to a 2.5 GW built capacity pipeline. The definitions differ and cannot be summed.
- Total leasable pipeline
- 3,900 MW leasable
2026-06-30
- Evidence scope
- Operator portfolio · CDC
- Evidence as-of date
- 2026-06-30
How to read this: Includes existing operating and future capacity across Australia and New Zealand. It is not additional pipeline or site-allocated IT capacity and is not additive to facility totals.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
Keppel Morwell AI Data Centre Campus: disclosed development boundary
Already recorded in Atlas. The ultimate campus ceiling is not additive to component phases.
- Gross facility power
- ≤ 720 MW gross power
ultimate-campus; planned
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · Keppel Data Centres
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Already recorded in Atlas. The ultimate campus ceiling is not additive to component phases.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
AirTrunk MEL2 Melbourne: disclosed development boundary
Primary campus announcement. The map construction classification has not been independently established.
- Disclosed campus specification
- ≥ 354 MW unspecified electrical boundary
ultimate-campus; planned
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · AirTrunk
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Primary campus announcement. The map construction classification has not been independently established.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
AirTrunk MEL1 Melbourne: disclosed development boundary
Do not label all 276 MW operating or all of it future capacity.
- Disclosed campus specification
- ≥ 276 MW unspecified electrical boundary
ultimate-campus-including-operating; unknown
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · AirTrunk
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Do not label all 276 MW operating or all of it future capacity.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
CDC Brooklyn Campus: disclosed development boundary
Includes built BK1/BK2 and future capacity. The whole 350 MW must not be added to its component buildings.
- Disclosed campus specification
- ≥ 350 MW unspecified electrical boundary
ultimate-campus-including-operating; unknown
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · CDC
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Includes built BK1/BK2 and future capacity. The whole 350 MW must not be added to its component buildings.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
CDC Laverton Campus: disclosed development boundary
Operator says the campus is under construction. Phase completion targets differ. Do not add the older 150 MW announcement again.
- Disclosed campus specification
- ≥ 400 MW unspecified electrical boundary
ultimate-campus; construction
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · CDC
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Operator says the campus is under construction. Phase completion targets differ. Do not add the older 150 MW announcement again.
Inspect 2 sources
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
STACK MEL01 campus: disclosed development boundary
Four building design values are 36, 36, 54 and 54 MW. This envelope includes the completed first facility.
- Disclosed campus specification
- 180 MW unspecified electrical boundary
ultimate-campus-including-operating; unknown
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · STACK Infrastructure
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Four building design values are 36, 36, 54 and 54 MW. This envelope includes the completed first facility.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
STACK MEL02 campus: disclosed development boundary
Hold numeric IT promotion until the 250/252 MW discrepancy and lifecycle allocation are resolved.
- Disclosed campus specification
- 252 MW campus capacity; conflicting250MWcriticalheading
ultimate-campus; unknown
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · STACK Infrastructure
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Hold numeric IT promotion until the 250/252 MW discrepancy and lifecycle allocation are resolved.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
Centuria Clayton proposed data centre: disclosed development boundary
Separate development from the existing Telstra facility. A ceiling does not represent committed capacity.
- Disclosed campus specification
- ≤ 40 MW unspecified electrical boundary
separate-expansion; planned
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · Centuria Industrial REIT
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Separate development from the existing Telstra facility. A ceiling does not represent committed capacity.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
Project Atlas Data Centre Eastern Creek: disclosed development boundary
Grid connection apparent-power envelope, not IT MW.
- Apparent electrical power
- 500 MVA
Project design; planned
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · Goodman
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Grid connection apparent-power envelope, not IT MW.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
CDC Marsden Park Campus: disclosed development boundary
Approved power-consumption envelope across six buildings; current fit-out MW not disclosed.
- Disclosed campus specification
- 504 MW (facility-power)
Project design; construction
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · CDC
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Approved power-consumption envelope across six buildings; current fit-out MW not disclosed.
Inspect 2 sources
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
STACK SYD01 campus: disclosed development boundary
Operator gross substation capacity; 360 MW separate campus headline has no explicit IT basis on this page.
- Gross facility power
- ≥ 450 MW (gross-power)
Project design; planned
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · STACK Infrastructure
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Operator gross substation capacity; 360 MW separate campus headline has no explicit IT basis on this page.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
AirTrunk SYD3 Sydney West: disclosed development boundary
Whole campus envelope; incremental extension not quantified. No 400 MW addition assumed.
- Disclosed campus specification
- ≥ 400 MW (unspecified-design-power)
Project design; construction
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · AirTrunk
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Whole campus envelope; incremental extension not quantified. No 400 MW addition assumed.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
GreenSquareDC SYD1: disclosed development boundary
Current operator capacity card explicitly labels 100 MW-plus IT for the whole campus, including a 15 MW first-stage refurbishment of an existing centre.
- Disclosed campus specification
- ≥ 100 MW IT design
Whole-campus design; construction under way
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · GreenSquareDC
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: Whole-campus design is not an additive construction increment. The existing/refurbished/remaining delivery split needs reconciliation; passing the first-stage Q3 2026 target does not establish commissioning.
Inspect 2 sources
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
Goodman Macquarie Park: disclosed development boundary
Approved Apollo total power consumption across eight halls at 4–10 Talavera Road. It is not an explicit IT-load observation.
- Disclosed campus specification
- 135 MW (facility-power)
Project design; planned
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · Goodman
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Approved Apollo total power consumption across eight halls at 4–10 Talavera Road. It is not an explicit IT-load observation.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
IREN Bundey campus: disclosed development boundary
An 800 MW electricity connection supports a proposed 600 MW IT campus design across three halls. Energisation from 2028 is a connection target, not delivery of the whole campus.
- Electricity connection capacity
- ≤ 800 MW (grid-connection)
Whole campus connection; proposed envelope
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · IREN
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: The 800 MW connection and 600 MW proposed IT design have distinct electrical boundaries and are not additive. A federal referral decision is recorded; state development consent and operating halls are not established by the reviewed records. No completion year for the full design is established.
Inspect 2 sources
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
Firmus Bell Bay AI Factory: disclosed development boundary
Not an IT figure. Site approval claim from secondary reporting still needs current council verification.
- Electricity connection capacity
- ≈ 288 MW (grid-demand)
Whole Bell Bay/George Town site; proposed envelope
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · Firmus
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Not an IT figure. Site approval claim from secondary reporting still needs current council verification.
Inspect the source
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
CDC Maddington Campus: disclosed development boundary
CDC reports more than 200 MW for the eventual campus without an explicit IT-versus-facility power basis. The first of four buildings is under construction and targeting January 2027; its MW allocation is undisclosed.
- Disclosed campus specification
- ≥ 200 MW (unspecified)
Whole planned Perth campus; proposed envelope
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · CDC
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: Whole-campus design capacity overlaps the first building under construction and is excluded from the comparable IT subtotal. January 2027 is the first-building target only, not a complete-campus date. The secondary 150 MW IT claim lacks a verified primary locator.
Inspect 3 sources
Link to this evidence ↗Facility specificationAustraliaReported observation
Beetaloo Digital Campus: disclosed development boundary
Original ASX PDF page 7 visually checked: 2 GW is explicitly on-site gas-fired power generation. No IT conversion or addition is justified.
- Disclosed campus specification
- ≤ 2,000 MW (generation)
Energy generation supporting the planned Weddell campuses; proposed envelope
- Evidence scope
- Named facility · Beetaloo Energy
- Evidence as-of date
- Applicable date not stated
How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Original ASX PDF page 7 visually checked: 2 GW is explicitly on-site gas-fired power generation. No IT conversion or addition is justified.
Inspect the source
- beetaloo-launch-pdf ↗
Beetaloo Energy / Northern Territory Government · checked 2026-09-22 · published 2026-07-22
Original ASX announcement bundle PDF page 7, reproduced NT Government media release
Link to this evidence ↗