From demand for AI to the infrastructure that serves it.

AEMO expects a much larger electricity footprint.

AEMO forecasts NEM data-centre electricity consumption of approximately 5 TWh in 2025–26 and 34 TWh in 2035–36.

Annual data centre electricity

≈ 5 TWh/year

2025–26

Annual data centre electricity

≈ 34 TWh/year

2035–36

Share of grid-supplied electricity

≈ 3 percent of grid-supplied electricity

2025–26

Share of grid-supplied electricity

≈ 13 percent of grid-supplied electricity

2035–36

Evidence scope

Regional

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-25

How to read this: Forecast, not measured national facility total. NEM geography is not all Australia. Incorporates attrition, consumption-versus-connection distinction and ramp-up. Do not convert to GPUs or combine annual points with older forecast vintages.

Connection requests reveal a large, early-stage pipeline.

At end-March 2026, 11 large data-centre projects represented 5.4 GW maximum demand in the NEM transmission connection process.

Large transmission projects

11 projects

2026-03-31

Maximum connection demand

5.4 GW maximum demand

2026-03-31

Evidence scope

Regional

Evidence as-of date

2026-03-31

How to read this: Projects above 5 MW; most early-stage. Not commissioned or contracted capacity. Power, not annual energy. Distribution projects are outside this stated transmission scope.

New Zealand: digital growth is a scenario, not a forecast.

Transpower’s Aotearoa Intelligence scenario explores digital-sector growth, with data centres contributing materially to additional electricity demand.

Evidence scope

National

Evidence as-of date

2026-06

How to read this: One of five alternative futures to 2050 and beyond, not an official forecast. Its assumptions include a stronger digital economy and supportive policy. No graph-derived data centre quantity is accepted; the report’s 73 TWh figure is total national electricity, not data centre use.

S6 training and inference design capability

NEXTDC describes S6 as an AI factory for GPU-intensive training, inference and large-scale model operations, with liquid-cooling support.

Evidence scope

Named facility · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

Workloads described

Model training · Inference

How to read this: This establishes design capability, not installed GPU inventory or the proportion of its 2.7 MW built capacity serving those workloads. The 13.5 MW design figure includes built and future fit-out.

Sharon AI GPU service in three NEXTDC east-coast facilities

NEXTDC's customer story states Sharon AI established its NVIDIA DGX-based GPU service in three Tier IV east-coast facilities. Workload examples include fraud detection, weather mapping, genome research and low-latency inference.

Reported NEXTDC facility footprint

3 facilities

Undated customer story reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

Workloads described

Inference · High-performance computing

Hardware disclosed

NVIDIA DGX (model unspecified) (quantity not disclosed)

How to read this: Facility codes, individual GPU models, GPU counts and contracted MW are not disclosed. Do not attach this deployment to three guessed site records.

Sharon AI H200 cluster at an unnamed NEXTDC Melbourne facility

The 30 June 2025 operator article explicitly identifies a Sharon AI H200 supercluster hosted at NEXTDC's Melbourne facility.

Evidence scope

Regional · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2025-06-30

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

Hardware disclosed

NVIDIA H200 (quantity not disclosed)

How to read this: The article does not name M1, M2 or M3 or give installed GPU count. Its overseas university examples and other vendors' H200 counts are not Australian facility inventory. Retain regional scope without facility IDs.

A1 fit-out for AI deployment

FY26 p 18 says an additional 2 MW is in progress to support AI deployment.

Fit-out in progress

2 MW

FY26 results published 2026-08-27

Evidence scope

Named facility · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Construction purpose is not an operating GPU deployment, workload split or model/count inventory. These MW already exist in the capacity-stage data and are not additive research capacity.

P2 fit-out for AI deployment

FY26 p 18 says an additional 4 MW is in progress to support AI deployment.

Fit-out in progress

4 MW

FY26 results published 2026-08-27

Evidence scope

Named facility · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Construction purpose is not an operating GPU deployment, workload split or model/count inventory. These MW already exist in the capacity-stage data and are not additive research capacity.

M2 high-density liquid-to-chip expansion

FY26 p 18 describes 60 MW of additional high-density liquid-to-chip fit-out at M2.

Fit-out in progress

60 MW

FY26 results published 2026-08-27

Evidence scope

Named facility · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Supports the cooling design of the construction phase, not a named GPU deployment or measured workload. Already included in existing stage capacity.

Highbrook acquisition and planned AI-ready upgrade

Datacom identifies Highbrook as its acquired T4 Auckland facility and says it will be upgraded for AI-ready high-density workloads with liquid cooling.

Evidence scope

Named facility · Datacom

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Acquisition date, upgrade MW, commencement date, GPU models and installed GPU counts are not stated. Future AI capability does not prove current training or inference deployments. T4 Auckland and Datacom Highbrook are one physical facility.

Bell Bay is designed for frontier-model training

The proposed Bell Bay project describes training and running frontier models, approximately 288 MW maximum grid demand and a direct-to-chip cooling architecture supporting NVIDIA GB300 and Vera Rubin.

Maximum grid demand

≈ 288 MW

Undated specification; checked 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

Workloads described

Model training

Hardware disclosed

NVIDIA GB300 (quantity not disclosed); NVIDIA Vera Rubin (quantity not disclosed)

How to read this: Hardware models are design compatibility, not an order, delivery or installation. No IT-load conversion or GPU quantity is supported.

Historical Melbourne rollout and DGX Cloud plan

October 2025 announcement targeted 18,500 ordered GB300 GPUs online in April 2026 and said DGX Cloud would establish a Southgate Melbourne region.

Evidence scope

Regional · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

2025-10

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

Hardware disclosed

NVIDIA GB300 · 18,500 GPU

How to read this: Historical target only. Cannot infer achievement from a past target date, or identify the unnamed March 2026 customer as NVIDIA. No exact CDC campus is established.

Tasmanian greenfield campus has a 36,800 GB300 plan

The March 2026 contract release separately describes a Tasmanian greenfield campus under construction with approximately 36,800 NVIDIA GB300 GPUs and late 2026 completion target.

Evidence scope

Regional · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

2026-03-02

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

Hardware disclosed

NVIDIA GB300 · ≈ 36,800 GPU

How to read this: The passage says Tasmania without naming the physical site. Launceston is a plausible match, not a verified identity mapping. Do not copy this count to any of the three Tasmania records or count it as deployed.

Firmus reports an operating Australian AI factory

September 8 statement identifies two operational sites across the portfolio, one in Australia and one in Singapore.

Operational Australian site stated at country level

1 site

Evidence as of 2026-09-08

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

2026-09-08

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Australian site is not named in this passage. The disclosure does not prove Launceston, Bell Bay or Wesley Vale has opened; it must not create a second physical record for a hosted CDC deployment.

Macquarie markets support for AI training and inference

AI solutions describe high-density air/liquid cooling and support for training and inference. These are colocation capabilities centred on the new IC3 Super West offer.

Evidence scope

Named facility · Macquarie Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

Workloads described

Model training · Inference

How to read this: Capability statement, not observed workload allocation, deployed GPU inventory or confirmation the new facility is open. No model or count is published here.

Dell AI Factory with NVIDIA collaboration names IC3 Super West

August 2025 announcement says Dell AI Factory with NVIDIA infrastructure and software will be supported by IC3 Super West for private/enterprise AI and neocloud projects.

Evidence scope

Named facility · Macquarie Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

2025-08-08

Workloads described

Model training

How to read this: Supplier collaboration and future-capability claim. No specific GPU model, unit count, live deployment or named end-customer contract disclosed. Do not treat Dell/NVIDIA as a capacity tenant.

harrison.ai deployed eight DGX A100 systems in Sydney

Equinix's 7 February 2023 Australian announcement states harrison.ai deployed eight NVIDIA DGX A100 systems at an unnamed Sydney IBX, supporting healthcare model training, data analytics and scientific computing.

Evidence scope

Regional · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

2023-02-07

Workloads described

Model training · High-performance computing

Hardware disclosed

NVIDIA DGX A100 · 8 systems

How to read this: Eight systems is not eight GPUs. The press release does not name the facility code or disclose a current 2026 hardware count, system variant, contracted MW or total GPUs. Preserve historical regional deployment scope. Medical performance claims are not independently assessed.

Groq inference deployment at an unnamed Sydney IBX

The 17 November 2025 Australian announcement describes Groq's Sydney deployment and low-latency GroqCloud inference access for Australia and Asia-Pacific using its LPU Inference Engine.

Evidence scope

Regional · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

2025-11-17

Workloads described

Inference

Hardware disclosed

Groq LPU Inference Engine (generation unspecified) (quantity not disclosed)

How to read this: No IBX code, accelerator count or model generation is disclosed. The LPU is a distinct accelerator, not an NVIDIA GPU. Promotional speed/cost comparisons are not independently verified or included.

Diraq quantum system planned for a Sydney Equinix facility

On 1 September 2026 Diraq and Equinix announced a planned silicon-spin quantum system at an unnamed Sydney facility, with an eight-qubit chip, self-contained cryogenic/control equipment and an October 2026 installation-completion target.

Planned chip qubits

8 qubits

Announcement 2026-09-01

System power upper bound

≤ 20 kW

Announcement 2026-09-01

Evidence scope

Regional · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

2026-09-01

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

Hardware disclosed

Diraq silicon-spin quantum computer (eight-qubit chip) · 1 planned system

How to read this: Source says less than 20 kW, not exactly 20 kW. October is a target, not evidence of a commissioned system. No facility code is disclosed. Qubits are not GPUs, and this equipment load must not be added as independent data-centre supply.

Global Equinix Inference Exchange announced for Q1 2027

On 2 September 2026 Equinix announced Inference Exchange with NVIDIA Enterprise Reference Architectures and Together AI, targeting availability from Q1 2027.

Evidence scope

International · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

2026-09-02

Workloads described

Inference

How to read this: Global future service announcement, not evidence of an installed Australian GPU deployment. No named Australian site, GPU quantity, electrical capacity or local deployment date is specified.

Faded Servers hosting service supports Albury operating status

Leading Edge describes Faded Servers creating a server hosting colocation service from its Murray data centre in Albury, offering local customers rack-unit space.

Evidence scope

Named facility · Leading Edge Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

Workloads described

General-purpose compute

How to read this: This is a public customer service case study, not a disclosed signed compute offtake contract. The page is undated and provides no commissioning date, contracted MW, GPU model or training/inference workload split.

Meridien targets a 48 MW training-compute starter tranche

The developer targets 48 MW IT ready for service in 2030 within an initial 240 MW phase and describes AI training with liquid cooling. A 1 GW-plus expansion pathway is a larger nested ambition.

Starter tranche IT load

48 MW IT

RFS target 2030

Expansion pathway IT load

≥ 1,000 MW IT

long-term expansion, no accepted delivery year

Evidence scope

Named facility · Gingerah Energy

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

Workloads described

Model training

How to read this: Proposed design and delivery targets, not installed GPUs, contracts or operating load. The 48 MW starter is nested within the approximately 240 MW first-phase IT envelope now included once in the planning inventory. The whole-phase delivery date remains unresolved.

NEXTDC group contracted, billing and forward capacity

The FY26 presentation reports 740.1 MW pro forma contracted utilisation, 175.0 MW billing and a 565.1 MW forward order book. The forward order book consists of binding customer contracts subject to delivery and contract terms.

Contracted utilisation

740.1 MW

Pro forma as disclosed 2026-07-21

Billing utilisation

175 MW

2026-06-30

Forward order book

565.1 MW

FY26 pro forma contracted minus FY26 billing

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Group portfolio includes international capacity. Contracted capacity includes deferred starts and ramps but excludes options/reservations. Billing means revenue-recognised commitments, not measured electrical demand. Do not add these figures to physical capacity or allocate them to unnamed facilities. April 2026 figures of 667 MW contracted and 544 MW forward are superseded.

OpenAI and NEXTDC S7 memorandum of understanding

The 5 December 2025 announcement describes a MoU for a planned S7 hyperscale AI campus and GPU supercluster at Eastern Creek, with a first-phase delivery expectation in July–December 2027 subject to approvals.

Evidence scope

Named facility · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2025-12-05

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: A MoU is not proof of a binding MW offtake agreement or an operating GPU deployment. No phase MW, GPU model or count is disclosed. Do not assign all 550 MW of the S7 plan to the 2027 first phase. OpenAI's Australian enterprise customers named in the article are not identified as S7 tenants.

South Australia energy agreement covers 600 MW of load

Firmus reports a 12-year electricity supply agreement signed in June 2026 for its first South Australian AI factories and names Gunvor Group.

Electricity agreement load

600 MW

Evidence as of 2026-06

Agreement duration

12 years

Evidence as of 2026-06

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

2026-06

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: This is power procurement, not a compute customer/offtake contract. The source does not allocate 600 MW between sites or identify it as IT load. Existing 1000/1300 MW campus IT envelopes remain approval-dependent.

A Melbourne GB300 contract is publicly disclosed

Firmus reported a multi-year, multi-billion-dollar commitment from an unnamed global technology company for approximately 18,400 NVIDIA GB300 GPUs at its Melbourne deployment.

Evidence scope

Regional · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

2026-03-02

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

Hardware disclosed

NVIDIA GB300 · ≈ 18,400 GPU

How to read this: The contract announcement does not identify a CDC physical campus, commissioning date or actual installed count. Do not assign it to CDC Brooklyn/Laverton by inference. The 18,400 contracted quantity is not additive to the earlier 18,500 deployment plan.

The 170,000-accelerator agreement belongs to Indonesia

Firmus describes a 360 MW Batam campus and a NVIDIA partnership covering up to 170,000 accelerators across Grace-Blackwell, Vera-Rubin and Vera platforms in 2027-2028.

Agreement accelerator maximum

≤ 170,000 accelerators

2027-2028

Evidence scope

Regional · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

2026-06

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Geography is Batam Indonesia, outside AU/NZ; no ANZ allocation. Model-generation quantities are not broken out. The agreement runs through 2034;170,000 does not mean installed today.

OpenAI contract belongs to two Malaysian sites

September 8 partnership commits dedicated AI compute at two Malaysian AI factories using Vera Rubin NVL72/DSX with Firmus HyperCube.

Evidence scope

Regional · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

2026-09-08

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

Hardware disclosed

NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72 (quantity not disclosed)

How to read this: Malaysia only. More than 900 MW is the entire contracted portfolio across customers, not a disclosed OpenAI amount or an Australian total. Country-level operating statements and future Malaysian deployment must stay separate.

IREN Microsoft GB300 capacity is in Texas

The five-year Microsoft contract covers four phases totalling 200 MW critical IT at Childress Texas. August 2026 results confirm first 50 MW Horizon 1 delivered; later phases remain at commissioning/construction stages.

Total contracted critical IT load

200 MW

Evidence as of 2026-08-27

Horizon 1 delivered IT capacity

50 MW

Evidence as of 2026-08-27

Contract duration

5 years

Evidence as of 2026-08-27

Evidence scope

Regional · IREN

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

Hardware disclosed

NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 (quantity not disclosed)

How to read this: No Australian allocation and no GPU count disclosed in these sources. These are overlapping total/phase quantities and must not be added.

IREN discloses a broader AI customer portfolio

August 2026 results name recent signings with Cohere, Prometheus, Perplexity, Figure AI, Fal AI and Higgsfield AI, plus an unnamed frontier lab.

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · IREN

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Customer list is portfolio-level. No contract capacity, workload or Australian facility assignment can be inferred for the named customers.

Datagrid signed a 140 MW electricity price-hedge option

March 2026 announcement describes a 15-year Power Purchase Option Agreement with Mercury,140 MW/1.2 TWh annually, providing a long-term electricity price hedge for the Southland campus.

Power agreement size

140 MW

Evidence as of 2026-03-18

Agreement term

15 years

Evidence as of 2026-03-18

Annual energy under option

1.2 TWh

per year

Evidence scope

Named facility · Datagrid

Evidence as-of date

2026-03-18

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Power procurement/price hedge, not guaranteed live physical load, IT capacity or an AI customer offtake. March forecast of June construction is not evidence it started. Full project delivery 2028 is a target.

Groq and Equinix announced a 4.5 MW Sydney inference facility

The same November 2025 announcement says the partners will establish a 4.5 MW Groq facility in Sydney, separately from its description of an initial deployment.

Announced Groq facility power, basis unspecified

4.5 MW

Australian announcement 2025-11-17

Evidence scope

Regional · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

2025-11-17

Workloads described

Inference

How to read this: Future-tense statement with no named IBX, electrical basis, installed amount or completion date. It is not evidence that all 4.5 MW was live at announcement, a public quantified lease offtake, or additional physical capacity beyond an existing host campus.

Western Downs developer confirms an Anthropic lease

The developer confirms Anthropic has signed a long-term lease at Western Downs Digital Park. The proposed campus remains subject to planning and regulatory approvals.

Evidence scope

Named facility · Zerra DC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

Workloads described

Not specified in this evidence

How to read this: Current primary material does not quantify leased IT MW, identify building-one capacity or confirm a 2027 delivery date. Reported campus capacity and an unquantified lease are different claims.

SYD3’s design envelope is not its operating capacity.

AirTrunk describes a multi-building Sydney West campus with 42 data halls and a design PUE of 1.15.

Campus headline

≥ 400 MW

Undated operator specification; checked 11 September 2026

Design PUE

1.15 ratio

Undated operator specification; checked 11 September 2026

Technical data hall area

70,000 m²

Undated operator specification; checked 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · AirTrunk

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The live location page and earlier platform announcement differ on ultimate campus scale. No commissioned IT split or installed GPU fleet is established; the campus headline is excluded from site capacity totals.

MEL2’s published footprint describes the proposed campus.

AirTrunk specifies a Melbourne north-west campus with diverse 66 kV feeds and up to 32 technical data halls.

Campus headline

≥ 354 MW

Undated operator specification; checked 11 September 2026

Design PUE

1.15 ratio

Undated operator specification; checked 11 September 2026

Technical data hall area

42,240 m²

Undated operator specification; checked 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · AirTrunk

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This is a design specification, not a measured operating allocation. The electrical basis of the campus headline is not defined as IT power and remains outside the comparable totals.

Silverdale One: an explicit operating disclosure with an unresolved power basis.

CDC’s Auckland location page describes 22 MW as operating capacity for this named campus.

Operator-reported operating capacity

22 MW

Undated operator specification; checked 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · CDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The operator does not define whether the number is IT load or total facility power on this page. It is retained as evidence and excluded from the IT power subtotal; no GPU count is inferred.

Hobsonville One: an explicit operating disclosure with an unresolved power basis.

CDC’s Auckland location page describes 22 MW as operating capacity for this named campus.

Operator-reported operating capacity

22 MW

Undated operator specification; checked 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · CDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The operator does not define whether the number is IT load or total facility power on this page. It is retained as evidence and excluded from the IT power subtotal; no GPU count is inferred.

Hobsonville Two: an explicit operating disclosure with an unresolved power basis.

CDC’s Auckland location page describes 54 MW as operating capacity for this named campus.

Operator-reported operating capacity

54 MW

Undated operator specification; checked 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · CDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The operator does not define whether the number is IT load or total facility power on this page. It is retained as evidence and excluded from the IT power subtotal; no GPU count is inferred.

Marsden Park has a dated planning approval.

The NSW Planning Portal records SSD-70889211 as approved on 27 November 2025. The project description comprises six four-storey data centre buildings and associated infrastructure.

Approved project power consumption

504 MW

Planning determination, 27 November 2025

Substation specification

720 MW

Planning project description

Evidence scope

Named facility · CDC

Evidence as-of date

2025-11-27

How to read this: The substation rating and project power consumption are different electrical boundaries and cannot be added. Planning consent is separate from commissioning; CDC’s location page independently describes early construction. Neither number is an accepted commissioned IT-power contribution.

NEXTDC Australian fitted-out capacity: 277.9 MW

NEXTDC reports 287.9 MW consolidated built capacity at 30 June 2026, including 10 MW at Kuala Lumpur. The derived Australian portfolio is 277.9 MW. Named-site evidence allocates 273.45 MW within this portfolio.

Australian fitted-out capacity

277.9 MW IT

30 June 2026

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-06-30

How to read this: Built capacity is the designed power of fitted-out halls. Customer infrastructure may require further investment. The regional table rounds Australia to 278 MW. Named-site capacity is deducted before the remaining portfolio balance is counted.

GE1 subsea-connectivity construction

The FY26 p 18 development update links 1 MW in progress at GE1 to new or contracted submarine-cable infrastructure.

In-progress capacity

1 MW

FY26 results published 2026-08-27

Evidence scope

Named facility · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

How to read this: The selected disclosure does not identify a compute offtake customer or GPU inventory. Cable infrastructure is distinct from a GPU training deployment; the phase is already included in physical capacity.

D2 subsea-connectivity construction

The FY26 p 18 development update links 1.5 MW in progress at D2 to new or contracted submarine-cable infrastructure.

In-progress capacity

1.5 MW

FY26 results published 2026-08-27

Evidence scope

Named facility · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

How to read this: The selected disclosure does not identify a compute offtake customer or GPU inventory. Cable infrastructure is distinct from a GPU training deployment; the phase is already included in physical capacity.

SC2 subsea-connectivity construction

The FY26 p 18 development update links 1 MW in progress at SC2 to new or contracted submarine-cable infrastructure.

In-progress capacity

1 MW

FY26 results published 2026-08-27

Evidence scope

Named facility · NEXTDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

How to read this: The selected disclosure does not identify a compute offtake customer or GPU inventory. Cable infrastructure is distinct from a GPU training deployment; the phase is already included in physical capacity.

Kapua expandable power specification

Datacom describes Kapua as able to grow beyond 1,500 racks and to 14 MW usable power.

Expandable usable power

14 MW

Undated page reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Datacom

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This is expandability, not a dated installed IT observation or a construction phase. Do not put the 14 MW in current physical-capacity totals.

TenPeaks south disclosed campus capacity context

Body states 12.3 MW currently operating across two pods, 15 MW consented Pod 3, and future Pods 4/5. IT basis is not explicit. Animated headline is not accepted as the current value.

Reported operating power, basis unspecified

12.3 MW

Undated campus page reviewed 2026-09-11

Consented Pod 3 power, basis unspecified

15 MW

Undated campus page reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · TenPeaks

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: IT load is not explicitly distinguished from facility/other power in the selected body text. These values are context only, excluded from IT capacity totals. Consent, development potential and renewable generation are separate from installed server power. No GPU inventory is disclosed.

TenPeaks central disclosed campus capacity context

Body proposes an additional 15 MW building; IT basis and existing installed amount are unspecified. Animated headline counter is not reliable evidence.

Proposed additional building power, basis unspecified

15 MW

Undated campus page reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · TenPeaks

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: IT load is not explicitly distinguished from facility/other power in the selected body text. These values are context only, excluded from IT capacity totals. Consent, development potential and renewable generation are separate from installed server power. No GPU inventory is disclosed.

TenPeaks north disclosed campus capacity context

Body describes 40 MW initial and 80 MW+ potential design scale, with basis not explicitly IT. 5–7 MW renewable generation is a separate metric and cannot enter IT capacity totals.

Initial design power, basis unspecified

40 MW

Undated campus page reviewed 2026-09-11

Potential campus power, basis unspecified

≥ 80 MW

Undated campus page reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · TenPeaks

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: IT load is not explicitly distinguished from facility/other power in the selected body text. These values are context only, excluded from IT capacity totals. Consent, development potential and renewable generation are separate from installed server power. No GPU inventory is disclosed.

Launceston discloses 84 MW critical IT design capacity

Southgate names Launceston and 84 MW Critical IT Load; the Tasmania hub labels its anchor site under construction.

Disclosed campus critical IT envelope

84 MW

Undated specification; checked 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: No commissioned IT quantity, phase-by-phase fit-out or full 84 MW construction boundary is established. Do not turn this envelope into operating or fully fitted construction MW.

Wesley Vale discloses an initial 23 MW critical IT stage

The planned project describes 26 MW initial electrical capacity containing 23 MW critical IT, with a later 52 MW electrical maximum.

Initial critical IT load

23 MW

Undated specification; checked 11 September 2026

Initial electrical capacity

≈ 26 MW

Undated specification; checked 11 September 2026

Maximum electrical capacity

≈ 52 MW

Undated specification; checked 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Later IT figure is printed as approximately 46 WM, an apparent unit typo. Hold this figure for clarification; initial 23 MW is inside the ultimate project and cannot be added to 46. Text says train and run frontier models, not evidence of installed GPUs or current inference service.

Bundey remains an Australian development project

IREN's 800 MW transmission connection supports a proposed campus whose later federal referral specifies up to 600 MW IT across three halls. Neither figure describes a commissioned Australian GPU deployment.

Transmission support ceiling

≤ 800 MW

Evidence as of 2026-08-27

Evidence scope

Named facility · IREN

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-27

How to read this: The 800 MW connection is not IT load. The 600 MW IT value is a proposed design limit in a referral, not a consent, construction start or delivery schedule. IREN's overseas compute contracts do not establish a Bundey offtake.

IC3 Super West first fit-out and ultimate IT envelope differ

The February 2026 investor briefing reports initial 6 MW mechanical/electrical fit-out underway, targeting September 2026. Current facility marketing states 47 MW IT end-state and still describes construction.

Initial fit-out phase

6 MW

Evidence as of 2026-02-26

End-state IT envelope

47 MW

Evidence as of 2026-02-26

Evidence scope

Named facility · Macquarie Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

2026-02-26

How to read this: No opening inferred from current month. Initial 6 MW is part of 47 MW. Keep construction scope limited to verified fit-out, not all 47 MW. Breadcrumb retains 45 MW while main specification says 47 MW; use explicit current specification with caveat.

21 MW installed disclosure is a portfolio total

August 2026 full-year presentation reaffirms 21 MW installed across Macquarie Park, Canberra and Sydney CBD. It does not itemise fitted-out MW by building.

Portfolio installed capacity

21 MW installed; IT boundary not separately defined

FY26 presentation published 2026-08-26

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · Macquarie Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

2026-08-26

How to read this: Do not allocate the portfolio figure to individual IC1/IC2/IC3E/IC4/IC5 records. A near match to the 2 + 6 + 12 MW site specifications is not proof of their individual installed allocation. The shared specification table also contains the unbuilt 47 MW SuperWest end-state. This portfolio disclosure is not an extra contribution to site totals.

Makarewa has consented capacity of up to 240 MW IT

Council and regional authority describe six data halls in three modules and up to 240 MW IT capacity for AI training, data processing and storage.

Consented IT capacity ceiling

≤ 240 MW

Evidence as of 2026-03-13

Evidence scope

Named facility · Datagrid

Evidence as-of date

2026-03-13

How to read this: Consented whole-campus design maximum. Included once in the planned IT design inventory, not operating capacity or a dated installation forecast. Horizontal construction has commenced but its IT allocation is not disclosed; the 280 MW marketing boundary is not added.

Datagrid July 2026 notice covered road access works

Approved notice lists highway/Taylor Road realignment, road upgrade and haul-road construction, with a 28 July 2026 start.

Evidence scope

Named facility · Datagrid

Evidence as-of date

2026-07-28

How to read this: This historical pre-start notice concerns roads, not fitted-out data halls. Later August developer evidence confirms horizontal works and a September Stage 2 notice covers datacentre development. None allocates the whole 240 MW to construction.

AE1 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 414 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 3 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1.

Reported colocation floor area

414 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

3 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

BR1 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 832 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 3 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+20%.

Reported colocation floor area

832 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

3 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

CA1 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 577 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 3 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1.

Reported colocation floor area

577 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

3 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

ME1 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 3326 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 4 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1.

Reported colocation floor area

3,326 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

4 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

ME2 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 8172 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 4 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+2. High-Density Cooling is explicitly listed as an available product.

Reported colocation floor area

8,172 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

4 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

ME4 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 3460 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 3 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1.

Reported colocation floor area

3,460 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

3 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

ME5 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 3150 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 2 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+20%.

Reported colocation floor area

3,150 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

2 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

PE1 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 464 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 2 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1.

Reported colocation floor area

464 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

2 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

PE2 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 1170 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 3 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1.

Reported colocation floor area

1,170 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

3 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

PE3 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 1951 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 4 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1. High-Density Cooling is explicitly listed as an available product.

Reported colocation floor area

1,951 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

4 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

SY1 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 3088 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 2 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1.

Reported colocation floor area

3,088 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

2 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

SY2 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 1586 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 4 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1. High-Density Cooling is explicitly listed as an available product.

Reported colocation floor area

1,586 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

4 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

SY3 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 6894 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 4 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1. High-Density Cooling is explicitly listed as an available product.

Reported colocation floor area

6,894 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

4 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

SY4 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 7445 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 4 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+20%.

Reported colocation floor area

7,445 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

4 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

SY5 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 4948 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 5 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1. High-Density Cooling is explicitly listed as an available product.

Reported colocation floor area

4,948 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

5 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

SY6 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 2364 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 4 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy N+1. High-Density Cooling is explicitly listed as an available product.

Reported colocation floor area

2,364 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

4 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

SY7 colocation specifications

Operator specifications disclose 1513 m² colocation space, minimum cabinet specification 3 kVA, UPS redundancy N+1 and cooling redundancy not disclosed in the retrieved specification.

Reported colocation floor area

1,513 m²

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Minimum cabinet power specification

3 kVA per cabinet

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Facility/service specification, not a dated installed IT load, occupancy, utilised space or GPU inventory. Cabinet apparent power cannot be converted to facility MW without additional electrical and deployment evidence. Absence of a listed cooling product is not proof the technology is absent.

SY9x reported power capacity and electrical-basis caveat

Current facility prose and the June 2022 opening announcement state more than 14 MW current power capacity and more than 28 MW at full build.

Current reported power, basis unspecified

≥ 14 MW

Undated page reviewed 2026-09-11

Full-build power, basis unspecified

≥ 28 MW

Undated page reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The installed IT basis is not explicit. The page table's 14kVA Total Sellable Capacity conflicts with its MW prose. Do not correct the unit by guessing; keep physical IT MW unknown. Ultimate and current power are overlapping, not additive. Current phase may have changed since 2022; undated text is not a dated observation.

SY5 full-build cabinet specification

SY5's current page describes 9,220 cabinets at full build and fibre cross-connect access to SY1/SY2/SY3/SY4.

Full-build cabinet target

9,220 cabinets

Undated operator specification reviewed 2026-09-11

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Full-build target, not current installed cabinets, GPU counts, occupied capacity or MW. Do not multiply it by the minimum cabinet kVA specification to estimate facility power.

PE3 opening-phase and campus connection

On 8 December 2021 Equinix announced PE3's opening adjacent to PE2 with a secure link bridge. The first phase provided 650 cabinets and over 1,830 m² colocation space; full-build targets were 1,650 cabinets and over 10,600 m².

Opening-phase cabinets

650 cabinets

Opening announcement 2021-12-08

Full-build cabinet target

1,650 cabinets

Target disclosed 2021-12-08

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

2021-12-08

How to read this: Opening announcement date does not establish exact electrical commissioning date or MW. Current page area differs from the historical phase specification; phase, date and metric boundaries are preserved. PE2/PE3 share one physical campus; do not merge their distinct building records.

St Leonards target power specification

Telstra's brochure lists 20 MW target power capacity for St Leonards, explicitly described as two 10 MW feeds.

Target power capacity, not IT load

20 MW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Telstra InfraCo

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This is a target electrical specification without a commissioned IT boundary or effective date. It remains outside operating, construction and planned IT subtotals. Redundant feeds are not additive usable IT capacity.

Clayton target power specification

Telstra's brochure lists 20 MW target power capacity for Clayton, explicitly described as two 10 MW feeds.

Target power capacity, not IT load

20 MW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Telstra InfraCo

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This is a target electrical specification without a commissioned IT boundary or effective date. It remains outside operating, construction and planned IT subtotals. Redundant feeds are not additive usable IT capacity.

Deakin target power specification

Telstra's brochure lists 4.5 MW target power capacity for Deakin.

Target power capacity, not IT load

4.5 MW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Telstra InfraCo

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This is a target electrical specification without a commissioned IT boundary or effective date. It remains outside operating, construction and planned IT subtotals. Redundant feeds are not additive usable IT capacity.

Fujitsu Western Sydney advertised IT specification

The current Fujitsu portfolio page advertises 92 MW IT Load for Western Sydney. The current page explicitly calls the 92 MW figure ultimate capacity.

Advertised IT load specification

92 MW IT

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Linked fact sheet site capacity, different basis

60 MVA

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Fujitsu

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The current web specification and linked fact sheet differ in electrical basis and sometimes scope. No power factor, commissioned phase, retrofit date or reconciled operating IT figure is disclosed. Neither quantity is added to operating totals.

Fujitsu Noble Park advertised IT specification

The current Fujitsu portfolio page advertises 28 MW IT Load for Noble Park. The current page labels the figure IT Load but does not identify a commissioned phase or measurement date.

Advertised IT load specification

28 MW IT

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Linked fact sheet site capacity, different basis

12 MVA

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Fujitsu

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The current web specification and linked fact sheet differ in electrical basis and sometimes scope. No power factor, commissioned phase, retrofit date or reconciled operating IT figure is disclosed. Neither quantity is added to operating totals.

Fujitsu Malaga advertised IT specification

The current Fujitsu portfolio page advertises 10 MW IT Load for Malaga. The current page labels the figure IT Load but does not identify a commissioned phase or measurement date.

Advertised IT load specification

10 MW IT

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Linked fact sheet site capacity, different basis

5 MVA

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Fujitsu

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The current web specification and linked fact sheet differ in electrical basis and sometimes scope. No power factor, commissioned phase, retrofit date or reconciled operating IT figure is disclosed. Neither quantity is added to operating totals.

Fujitsu Homebush advertised IT specification

The current Fujitsu portfolio page advertises 3 MW IT Load for Homebush. The current page labels the figure IT Load but does not identify a commissioned phase or measurement date.

Advertised IT load specification

3 MW IT

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Linked fact sheet site capacity, different basis

6 MVA

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Fujitsu

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The current web specification and linked fact sheet differ in electrical basis and sometimes scope. No power factor, commissioned phase, retrofit date or reconciled operating IT figure is disclosed. Neither quantity is added to operating totals.

Fujitsu North Ryde advertised IT specification

The current Fujitsu portfolio page advertises 4.8 MW IT Load for North Ryde. The current page labels the figure IT Load but does not identify a commissioned phase or measurement date.

Advertised IT load specification

4.8 MW IT

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Linked fact sheet site capacity, different basis

4.8 MVA

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Fujitsu

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The current web specification and linked fact sheet differ in electrical basis and sometimes scope. No power factor, commissioned phase, retrofit date or reconciled operating IT figure is disclosed. Neither quantity is added to operating totals.

Fujitsu Eight Mile Plains advertised IT specification

The current Fujitsu portfolio page advertises 2 MW IT Load for Eight Mile Plains. The current page labels the figure IT Load but does not identify a commissioned phase or measurement date.

Advertised IT load specification

2 MW IT

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Linked fact sheet site capacity, different basis

2 MVA

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Fujitsu

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The current web specification and linked fact sheet differ in electrical basis and sometimes scope. No power factor, commissioned phase, retrofit date or reconciled operating IT figure is disclosed. Neither quantity is added to operating totals.

Interactive distinguishes six data centres from three physical sites

Interactive describes six data centres across its Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane sites and publishes one physical address for each campus.

Operator-described data centre units

6 data centres

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Physical sites

3 sites

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Interactive

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The six internal data centre units do not establish six physical campuses. No site IT MW or installed GPU count is disclosed.

5G Networks separates owned sites from partner reach

The current operator page says it owns five data centres and partners with over forty more. Its city tables include other operators and network locations.

Operator-reported owned data centres

5 data centres

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · 5G Networks

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The portfolio count is not a row-by-row verification of ownership. Do not count every point of presence as a 5G Networks facility, allocate partner capacity, or infer the Brisbane owned-site address from a DCI network entry.

NTL1 Newcastle modular capacity specification

Leading Edge advertises 1500 kW total site capacity and 375 kW IT load per module for NTL1.

Total site capacity, basis not specified

1,500 kW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

IT load capacity per module

375 kW IT per module

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Leading Edge Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The site total is not explicitly labelled commissioned IT load. Installed module count is unknown. Do not multiply module capacity by an inferred count, add the module and site figures, or infer current operation from the technical specification.

TMW 1 Tamworth modular capacity specification

Leading Edge advertises 375 kW total site capacity and 375 kW IT load per module for TMW 1.

Total site capacity, basis not specified

375 kW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

IT load capacity per module

375 kW IT per module

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Leading Edge Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The site total is not explicitly labelled commissioned IT load. Installed module count is unknown. Do not multiply module capacity by an inferred count, add the module and site figures, or infer current operation from the technical specification.

DBO1 Dubbo modular capacity specification

Leading Edge advertises 750 kW total site capacity and 375 kW IT load per module for DBO1.

Total site capacity, basis not specified

750 kW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

IT load capacity per module

375 kW IT per module

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Leading Edge Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The site total is not explicitly labelled commissioned IT load. Installed module count is unknown. Do not multiply module capacity by an inferred count, add the module and site figures, or infer current operation from the technical specification.

ABX1 Albury modular capacity specification

Leading Edge advertises 750 kW total site capacity and 375 kW IT load per module for ABX1.

Total site capacity, basis not specified

750 kW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

IT load capacity per module

375 kW IT per module

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Leading Edge Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The site total is not explicitly labelled commissioned IT load. Installed module count is unknown. Do not multiply module capacity by an inferred count, add the module and site figures, or infer current operation from the technical specification.

CFS1 Coffs Harbour modular capacity specification

Leading Edge advertises 300 kW total site capacity and 150 kW IT load per module for CFS1.

Total site capacity, basis not specified

300 kW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

IT load capacity per module

150 kW IT per module

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Leading Edge Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The site total is not explicitly labelled commissioned IT load. Installed module count is unknown. Do not multiply module capacity by an inferred count, add the module and site figures, or infer current operation from the technical specification.

WGA1 Wagga Wagga modular capacity specification

Leading Edge advertises 300 kW total site capacity and 150 kW IT load per module for WGA1.

Total site capacity, basis not specified

300 kW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

IT load capacity per module

150 kW IT per module

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Leading Edge Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The site total is not explicitly labelled commissioned IT load. Installed module count is unknown. Do not multiply module capacity by an inferred count, add the module and site figures, or infer current operation from the technical specification.

Host Networks separates current protected power from upgrade potential

The Brandl Street facility page specifies 550 kW current protected power and 1.25 MW in a described Tier III upgrade configuration.

Current protected electrical power, not IT load

550 kW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Protected power in described Tier III upgrade

1.25 MW

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Edge Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Protected power is not stated to be commissioned IT load. The upgrade quantity is not a verified construction phase. Rack counts, cabinet density, cooling and redundant infrastructure are not used to infer IT MW.

Vocus data centre reach is a connectivity measure

Vocus says it connects directly to 150 data centres across Australia.

Directly connected data centres

150 data centres

Undated current specification, retrieved 11 September 2026

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · Vocus

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This measures carrier network reach, not ownership or operation of those facilities. No new Vocus owned-site record or capacity is proposed.

Earlier Mamre Road power descriptions used different boundaries

The current NSW portal lists 1 GW power and six buildings, while the project manager describes 1.2 GW and three buildings. The neutral planning identity is retained because the consultant keeps the client confidential.

Planning portal power capacity, basis unspecified

1,000 MW

current undated portal description

Project manager campus power, basis unspecified

1,200 MW

current undated case study

Evidence scope

Named facility

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Earlier portal and consultant descriptions are retained as historical context for one campus. The July 2026 amended assessment now establishes approximately 750 MW proposed IT and names the AirTrunk SYD4 engineering project. It does not establish title transfer or live capacity.

Mamre Road historical design model separates IT load from total power

A December 2025 GHG assessment model assumes approximately 1.04 GW IT across 26 shells, within approximately 1.2 GW total power. It models initial operations from 2028 and full campus operations in 2036.

Modelled peak campus IT load

≈ 1,040 MW IT

December 2025 indicative design, full operation modelled in 2036

Modelled total campus power

≈ 1,200 MW total power

December 2025 indicative design

Evidence scope

Named facility

Evidence as-of date

2025-12-04

How to read this: Historical December 2025 model only. The July 2026 revision reduced proposed IT from 1.04 GW to approximately 0.75 GW. Earlier 2028/2036 model dates do not describe the current proposal and do not enter accepted delivery targets.

Project Atlas discloses 500 MVA, not IT MW

Goodman proposes a two-building data centre campus at 10 Roberts Road, Eastern Creek. The official application and planning summary specify apparent electrical power of 500 MVA.

Proposed campus apparent power

500 MVA

planning application

Proposed data centre buildings

2 buildings

planning application

Evidence scope

Named facility · Goodman

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: No power-factor conversion or IT load is evidenced. This metric is excluded from the MW IT subtotal; assessment is ongoing.

Keppel secures an option to develop a large gross-power campus

Keppel secured rights to lease a 123 ha Morwell-area parcel with up to 720 MW gross power in phases. Its Agreement for Lease supports pre-development while approvals and utility contracts are pursued.

Gross campus powerbank

≤ 720 MW gross power

phased future development

Contiguous parcel under rights to lease

123 ha

January 2026 agreement

Evidence scope

Named facility · Keppel Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

2026-01-15

How to read this: Gross power is not IT capacity or installed capacity. Customer discussions are not signed offtake, and no opening date or street address is disclosed.

Zerra separates its battery from the future data halls

Stage 1 targets Q2 2028 and contains a data hall plus a 5 MW BESS. Up to five later halls are each described as 72 MW and scheduled progressively by 2034.

Stage 1 battery power

5 MW BESS

Stage 1 target Q2 2028

Later data hall power, basis unspecified

72 MW per hall

Stages 2-6 progressively by 2034

Number of later data hall buildings

≤ 5 buildings

Stages 2-6

Evidence scope

Named facility · Zerra DC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: No first-stage data hall MW or explicit IT basis for later halls is given. Do not count the battery or infer a 360/365/400 MW IT campus from these figures. The project has not been verified as approved.

Meridien phase-one investment plan in April 2026

WA Investments describes approximately 240 MW of phase-one IT processing capacity near Broome, supported by 1.4 GW renewable infrastructure. Its targets are an investment decision in 2029 and first-stage commercial operations in 2032.

Phase-one IT processing capacity

≈ 240 MW IT

April 2026 plan, first-stage commercial operations target 2032

Supporting renewable energy infrastructure

1,400 MW renewable capacity

April 2026 phase-one plan

Evidence scope

Named facility · Gingerah Energy

Evidence as-of date

2026-04-08

How to read this: The 240 MW includes the later developer-described 48 MW starter tranche and is not additive. An internally inconsistent mid-2030 full-scale date in this article is not used. The undated developer page is not asserted to supersede this dated article.

Project Ares plans one 1 GW IT campus in two phases

Energy North and its EPBC referral both describe a full-build 1 GW IT campus at Murranji Station. The referral identifies approximately 500 MW for Phase 1 and the remainder for Phase 2.

Proposed full-build campus IT capacity

1,000 MW IT

full build, no absolute date

Phase 1 within the 1 GW total

≈ 500 MW IT

first commissioning phase, no absolute date

Evidence scope

Named facility · Energy North

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The phases are components of the 1 GW campus and are never added on top. It is proposed capacity subject to approvals, funding and FID; the 12-18 month interval after FID does not establish a calendar opening year.

Project Ares has a separate proposed generation and storage system

The campus proposal includes off-grid solar generation, battery storage and gas generation. These energy assets support the IT load but are separate electrical and energy measures.

Solar generation nameplate

≈ 3,000 MWp

full-build proposal

Battery storage energy

≈ 16 GWh

full-build proposal

Gas generation for firming and backup

≤ 1,038 MW

full-build proposal

Evidence scope

Named facility · Energy North

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: MWp generation and GWh stored energy are not MW IT. Do not sum these measures into data centre capacity or present them as currently installed.

Western Downs discloses apparent electrical power per stage

Western Downs Digital Park describes four development stages and approximately 540 MVA of total facility demand per stage. That is an electrical design specification, not measured consumption or disclosed IT capacity.

Total facility demand design per stage

≈ 540 MVA

Undated developer FAQ reviewed 22 September 2026

Planned development stages

≤ 4 stages

Undated developer FAQ reviewed 22 September 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Zerra DC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Do not convert 540 MVA into IT MW, add it to a reported 360 MW figure, or combine the four-building application with a separate six-building engineering scenario.

Aurora has a staged pathway toward gigawatt-scale development

1414 Degrees disclosed a Heads of Agreement for up to 1 GW of data-centre infrastructure, beginning with an indicative 17 MW campus and an approximately 200 MW anchor campus as connection infrastructure progresses.

Ultimate data-centre pathway, power basis unspecified

≤ 1,000 MW

Heads of Agreement announced 27 July 2026

Nested starter campus, power basis unspecified

≈ 17 MW

Heads of Agreement announced 27 July 2026

Nested anchor campus, power basis unspecified

≈ 200 MW

Heads of Agreement announced 27 July 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility

Evidence as-of date

2026-07-27

How to read this: The figures are nested and cannot be added. No explicit IT basis, named operating partner, final customer contract or absolute completion date is disclosed. Energy assets are separate. The Heads of Agreement is non-binding except specified exclusivity/right-of-first-refusal provisions.

CDC reports a 3.9 GW leasable ANZ pipeline

September 2026 investor update reports 3.9 GW leasable pipeline as at 30 June 2026. Earlier 1.7 GW leasable capacity corresponded to a 2.5 GW built capacity pipeline. The definitions differ and cannot be summed.

Total leasable pipeline

3,900 MW leasable

2026-06-30

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · CDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-06-30

How to read this: Includes existing operating and future capacity across Australia and New Zealand. It is not additional pipeline or site-allocated IT capacity and is not additive to facility totals.

Keppel Morwell AI Data Centre Campus: disclosed development boundary

Already recorded in Atlas. The ultimate campus ceiling is not additive to component phases.

Gross facility power

≤ 720 MW gross power

ultimate-campus; planned

Evidence scope

Named facility · Keppel Data Centres

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Already recorded in Atlas. The ultimate campus ceiling is not additive to component phases.

AirTrunk MEL2 Melbourne: disclosed development boundary

Primary campus announcement. The map construction classification has not been independently established.

Disclosed campus specification

≥ 354 MW unspecified electrical boundary

ultimate-campus; planned

Evidence scope

Named facility · AirTrunk

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Primary campus announcement. The map construction classification has not been independently established.

AirTrunk MEL1 Melbourne: disclosed development boundary

Do not label all 276 MW operating or all of it future capacity.

Disclosed campus specification

≥ 276 MW unspecified electrical boundary

ultimate-campus-including-operating; unknown

Evidence scope

Named facility · AirTrunk

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Do not label all 276 MW operating or all of it future capacity.

CDC Brooklyn Campus: disclosed development boundary

Includes built BK1/BK2 and future capacity. The whole 350 MW must not be added to its component buildings.

Disclosed campus specification

≥ 350 MW unspecified electrical boundary

ultimate-campus-including-operating; unknown

Evidence scope

Named facility · CDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Includes built BK1/BK2 and future capacity. The whole 350 MW must not be added to its component buildings.

CDC Laverton Campus: disclosed development boundary

Operator says the campus is under construction. Phase completion targets differ. Do not add the older 150 MW announcement again.

Disclosed campus specification

≥ 400 MW unspecified electrical boundary

ultimate-campus; construction

Evidence scope

Named facility · CDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Operator says the campus is under construction. Phase completion targets differ. Do not add the older 150 MW announcement again.

STACK MEL01 campus: disclosed development boundary

Four building design values are 36, 36, 54 and 54 MW. This envelope includes the completed first facility.

Disclosed campus specification

180 MW unspecified electrical boundary

ultimate-campus-including-operating; unknown

Evidence scope

Named facility · STACK Infrastructure

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Four building design values are 36, 36, 54 and 54 MW. This envelope includes the completed first facility.

STACK MEL02 campus: disclosed development boundary

Hold numeric IT promotion until the 250/252 MW discrepancy and lifecycle allocation are resolved.

Disclosed campus specification

252 MW campus capacity; conflicting250MWcriticalheading

ultimate-campus; unknown

Evidence scope

Named facility · STACK Infrastructure

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Hold numeric IT promotion until the 250/252 MW discrepancy and lifecycle allocation are resolved.

Centuria Clayton proposed data centre: disclosed development boundary

Separate development from the existing Telstra facility. A ceiling does not represent committed capacity.

Disclosed campus specification

≤ 40 MW unspecified electrical boundary

separate-expansion; planned

Evidence scope

Named facility · Centuria Industrial REIT

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Separate development from the existing Telstra facility. A ceiling does not represent committed capacity.

Project Atlas Data Centre Eastern Creek: disclosed development boundary

Grid connection apparent-power envelope, not IT MW.

Apparent electrical power

500 MVA

Project design; planned

Evidence scope

Named facility · Goodman

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Grid connection apparent-power envelope, not IT MW.

CDC Marsden Park Campus: disclosed development boundary

Approved power-consumption envelope across six buildings; current fit-out MW not disclosed.

Disclosed campus specification

504 MW (facility-power)

Project design; construction

Evidence scope

Named facility · CDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Approved power-consumption envelope across six buildings; current fit-out MW not disclosed.

STACK SYD01 campus: disclosed development boundary

Operator gross substation capacity; 360 MW separate campus headline has no explicit IT basis on this page.

Gross facility power

≥ 450 MW (gross-power)

Project design; planned

Evidence scope

Named facility · STACK Infrastructure

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Operator gross substation capacity; 360 MW separate campus headline has no explicit IT basis on this page.

AirTrunk SYD3 Sydney West: disclosed development boundary

Whole campus envelope; incremental extension not quantified. No 400 MW addition assumed.

Disclosed campus specification

≥ 400 MW (unspecified-design-power)

Project design; construction

Evidence scope

Named facility · AirTrunk

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Whole campus envelope; incremental extension not quantified. No 400 MW addition assumed.

GreenSquareDC SYD1: disclosed development boundary

Current operator capacity card explicitly labels 100 MW-plus IT for the whole campus, including a 15 MW first-stage refurbishment of an existing centre.

Disclosed campus specification

≥ 100 MW IT design

Whole-campus design; construction under way

Evidence scope

Named facility · GreenSquareDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Whole-campus design is not an additive construction increment. The existing/refurbished/remaining delivery split needs reconciliation; passing the first-stage Q3 2026 target does not establish commissioning.

Goodman Macquarie Park: disclosed development boundary

Approved Apollo total power consumption across eight halls at 4–10 Talavera Road. It is not an explicit IT-load observation.

Disclosed campus specification

135 MW (facility-power)

Project design; planned

Evidence scope

Named facility · Goodman

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Approved Apollo total power consumption across eight halls at 4–10 Talavera Road. It is not an explicit IT-load observation.

IREN Bundey campus: disclosed development boundary

An 800 MW electricity connection supports a proposed 600 MW IT campus design across three halls. Energisation from 2028 is a connection target, not delivery of the whole campus.

Electricity connection capacity

≤ 800 MW (grid-connection)

Whole campus connection; proposed envelope

Evidence scope

Named facility · IREN

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The 800 MW connection and 600 MW proposed IT design have distinct electrical boundaries and are not additive. A federal referral decision is recorded; state development consent and operating halls are not established by the reviewed records. No completion year for the full design is established.

Firmus Bell Bay AI Factory: disclosed development boundary

Not an IT figure. Site approval claim from secondary reporting still needs current council verification.

Electricity connection capacity

≈ 288 MW (grid-demand)

Whole Bell Bay/George Town site; proposed envelope

Evidence scope

Named facility · Firmus

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Not an IT figure. Site approval claim from secondary reporting still needs current council verification.

CDC Maddington Campus: disclosed development boundary

CDC reports more than 200 MW for the eventual campus without an explicit IT-versus-facility power basis. The first of four buildings is under construction and targeting January 2027; its MW allocation is undisclosed.

Disclosed campus specification

≥ 200 MW (unspecified)

Whole planned Perth campus; proposed envelope

Evidence scope

Named facility · CDC

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: Whole-campus design capacity overlaps the first building under construction and is excluded from the comparable IT subtotal. January 2027 is the first-building target only, not a complete-campus date. The secondary 150 MW IT claim lacks a verified primary locator.

Beetaloo Digital Campus: disclosed development boundary

Original ASX PDF page 7 visually checked: 2 GW is explicitly on-site gas-fired power generation. No IT conversion or addition is justified.

Disclosed campus specification

≤ 2,000 MW (generation)

Energy generation supporting the planned Weddell campuses; proposed envelope

Evidence scope

Named facility · Beetaloo Energy

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This observation has its own electrical and physical boundary. It is not an additional contribution to the comparable IT subtotal, a GPU count or a delivery forecast. Original ASX PDF page 7 visually checked: 2 GW is explicitly on-site gas-fired power generation. No IT conversion or addition is justified.

CDC Australian operating ICT capacity: approximately 470 MW

CDC reports operating primary ICT capacity of approximately 120 MW in the ACT, 220 MW in NSW and 130 MW in Victoria at 30 June 2026. The regional figures are rounded to the nearest 10 MW.

Operating primary ICT capacity

≈ 470 MW IT

30 June 2026

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · CDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-06-30

How to read this: The portfolio is included once in the operating reconciliation. Brooklyn accounts for the Victorian 130 MW; other named-site allocations remain incomplete. Primary ICT excludes the redundancy and losses in CDC’s earlier built-capacity measure. It is available capacity, not actual consumption.

CDC New Zealand operating ICT capacity: approximately 80 MW

CDC reports approximately 80 MW of operating primary ICT capacity in New Zealand at 30 June 2026, rounded to the nearest 10 MW.

Operating primary ICT capacity

≈ 80 MW IT

30 June 2026

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · CDC

Evidence as-of date

2026-06-30

How to read this: The portfolio is included once in the operating reconciliation. Capacity is not allocated between individual Auckland buildings. Primary ICT is distinct from the operator’s earlier gross built-capacity measure.

TenPeaks launched with more than 23 MW operating across 11 facilities

Spark disclosed the existing operating capacity when completing the sale of 75 percent of its data-centre business to PEP.

Portfolio operating capacity

≥ 23 MW, boundary unspecified

2026-01-30

Facilities in transaction disclosure

11 facilities

2026-01-30

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · TenPeaks

Evidence as-of date

2026-01-30

How to read this: No per-site capacity split and no explicit IT boundary. The transaction count does not prove that Atlas directory entities map one-to-one to these 11 facilities. More than 130 MW was a development pipeline, not operating capacity.

STACK delivered its first Melbourne 36 MW building

Operator confirms first-phase 36 MW delivery on 22 August 2023; the second phase remained upcoming.

First building delivered capacity

36 MW, boundary unspecified

2023-08-22

Evidence scope

Named facility · STACK Infrastructure

Evidence as-of date

2023-08-22

How to read this: Electrical basis is not stated. This is nested inside the campus and duplicates the profile stage observation, so is not an additional sum. The then-72 MW or later 180 MW campus specification is not a delivered total.

Equinix SY9x reports more than 14 MW current power

The operator reports more than 14 MW operating at SY9x, distinct from the eventual >28 MW facility. Atlas interprets this as customer IT capacity from xScale’s commercial phase reporting, the operator’s IT-load terminology and the planning distinction between 45 MW gross and 30 MW IT design. This electrical-basis interpretation is inferred across sources, not a directly stated 14 MW IT specification. The separate 14 MW second phase remained under development at 30 June 2026.

Current power at opening

≥ 14 MW, boundary unspecified

2022-06-14

Evidence scope

Named facility · Equinix

Evidence as-of date

2022-06-14

How to read this: The 14 MW operating lower bound uses an explicit cross-source inference for its IT boundary. The second 14 MW phase was under development at 30 June 2026; eventual capacity is not counted as already operating.

SYD2 campus specification exceeds the separately evidenced phase

Current operator page gives 120+ MW for the campus. The completed third-phase increment of 30 MW is independently evidenced, but the entire 120 MW cannot be labelled commissioned from these statements.

Whole-campus specification

≥ 120 MW, delivery scope unresolved

Undated live operator page

Evidence scope

Named facility · AirTrunk

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: The 30 MW delivered phase is nested inside the campus specification. Never sum 120 and 30. Full campus IT commissioning remains unresolved.

DigiCo reports 41 MW Australian billing IT capacity

FY26 portfolio table reports 41 MW Australia and 44 MW North America. Australia is 41 MW both billing and contracted, excluding letters of intent.

Australian billing IT capacity

41 MW IT billing

2026-06-30

Australian contracted IT capacity

41 MW IT contracted

2026-06-30

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · DigiCo Infrastructure REIT

Evidence as-of date

2026-06-30

How to read this: Billing and contracted capacity are utilisation and commercial metrics, not installed-capacity additions. They refer to overlapping capacity and must not be added. This FY26 table does not disclose installed capacity.

DigiCo disclosed 32 MW Australian installed IT capacity at FY25

The FY25 table records 32 MW installed in Australia and 44 MW in North America, for 76 MW globally.

Australian installed IT capacity

32 MW IT installed

2025-06-30

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · DigiCo Infrastructure REIT

Evidence as-of date

2025-06-30

How to read this: This is a historical portfolio observation. Later site disclosures, including the SYD1 expansion, have different effective dates and must not be added to this total. FY26 billing and contracted figures measure different concepts.

Australia: about 1.5 GW of operational IT capacity

Data Centres Australia and DC Byte estimate Australia had about 1.5 GW of operational IT capacity across 162 data centres at 31 March 2026. This provides a national market benchmark alongside the Atlas’s partial site-level evidence.

National operational capacity

≈ 1,500 MW IT

31 March 2026

Operational data centres in source inventory

162 centres

31 March 2026

Evidence scope

National

Evidence as-of date

2026-03-31

How to read this: Operational capacity is the IT load supported by fitted-out halls available for use, not necessarily utilised capacity or live electricity demand. This rounded industry estimate has its own inventory and date. It is not an independently reconciled Atlas facility total and is never added to site subtotals or assigned to map pins.

Australia’s capacity by development stage

DC Byte’s national snapshot separates operating capacity, fit-out construction, committed development and early-stage proposals. At 31 March 2026 the combined total was about 21.6 GW, including existing operating capacity.

Operational

≈ 1,500 MW IT

31 March 2026

Under construction

≈ 200 MW IT

31 March 2026

Committed

≈ 3,100 MW IT

31 March 2026

Early stage

≈ 16,800 MW IT

31 March 2026

Evidence scope

National

Evidence as-of date

2026-03-31

How to read this: Construction means data halls undergoing mechanical and electrical fit-out. Committed projects meet DC Byte’s confidence criteria through secured development inputs or an operator’s track record. Early-stage projects may never proceed. The source’s 21.6 GW total includes operating capacity; it is not all future supply. These March estimates and the Atlas’s later facility inventory have different coverage and stage rules and must not be added together.

ABC: 27 approved or construction projects

ABC News reports at least 3.38 GW across 27 approved or construction projects. Its September 2026 analysis draws on planning records and company documents, with checks by RenewMap and CBRE.

Reported project capacity, rounded headline

≥ 3.38 GW mixed power

September 2026

Approved or construction projects

27 projects

September 2026

Evidence scope

National

Evidence as-of date

2026-09

How to read this: The reported 3.38 GW is rounded. The 24 numeric MW entries sum to 3,377.55 MW; the separate 90 MVA entry and two unquantified projects are excluded from that arithmetic. The entries mix computing-power, whole-facility and campus boundaries, so this is not a harmonised IT-power subtotal. The selected approved/construction projects do not cover every proposal in Australia, and approval does not guarantee delivery.

New Zealand: 56 centres and 104 MW of deployable facility power

NZTech's 2025 report estimates 56 operating data centres and 104 MW of deployable whole-facility power, including cooling and support systems.

Deployable whole-facility power

≈ 104 MW facility power

2025 report; exact capacity date unstated

Operating centres in report inventory

56 centres

July 2025 location input

Evidence scope

National

Evidence as-of date

Applicable date not stated

How to read this: This is estimated power for the whole facility, not installed customer IT load. The report uses operator inputs and proxies, excludes duplicated leased colocation capacity, and has a different inventory and date from the Atlas. It cannot be added to or subtracted from the 2026 CDC ICT portfolio figure.

TenPeaks: over 23 MW built across 11 operating facilities

Spark reported over 23 MW built across the 11 operating facilities that were transferred to TenPeaks in January 2026.

Built portfolio capacity, electrical basis not stated

≥ 23 MW (basis unstated)

Spark sale disclosure, 2025; transferred January 2026

Evidence scope

Operator portfolio · TenPeaks

Evidence as-of date

2025-08-12

How to read this: The primary disclosure does not say that the 23 MW is IT load or that it is comparable with CDC's leasable primary ICT measure. South Takanini's 12.3 MW is inside this transferred estate, not additional. It is excluded from Atlas operating IT totals until the power boundary is documented.

Bundey: 600 MW proposed IT design within an 800 MW electricity project

The federal referral specifies three proposed data halls of up to 200 MW IT each at Bundey, South Australia.

Proposed IT design ceiling

≤ 600 MW IT

Referral dated 31 July 2026

Electricity project ceiling

≤ 800 MW grid/project power

Campus proposal

Evidence scope

Named facility · IREN

Evidence as-of date

2026-07-31

How to read this: The IT and grid figures are different boundaries and are not additive. The IT figure is an upper design limit in a referral; the reviewed records do not establish state development consent, construction or operating capacity. No site-specific GPU deployment or tenant contract is established by the referral.

Julius Avenue: revised 76 MW proposed IT load

A later lodged design for 6–8 Julius Avenue specifies 76 MW IT across eight halls, down from an earlier 115.2 MW IT concept.

Proposed IT design ceiling

≤ 76 MW IT

Revision 06 dated 9 December 2025

Evidence scope

Named facility · ISPT

Evidence as-of date

2025-12-09

How to read this: The old 115.2 MW IT design and 169–170 MW whole-site figures are not additions. The current revision says 120 MW maximum whole-site power. The application remains under assessment; design is not installed capacity or a delivery forecast.

Project Mars: 60 MW maximum proposed IT load

The applicant's ESD report for 12 Mars Road gives a maximum 60 MW IT load, within 81 MW maximum whole-site electricity demand.

Proposed IT design ceiling

≤ 60 MW IT

Applicant report dated 17 February 2026

Evidence scope

Named facility · Goodman

Evidence as-of date

2026-02-17

How to read this: The project is at Response to Submissions, not approved or built. The 81 MW full-site figure and portal's approximately 90 MW description are not separate IT increments.